This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0021934706297878v1 39/4/508    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Collins-Chobanian, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Analysis of Paul Butler's Race-Based Jury Nullification and His Call to Black Jurors and the African American Community

Arizona State University

Paul Butler argues that due to disparate impact on African Americans in the criminal justice system, African American jurors ought to exercise their right of nullification when there are African American defendants of nonviolent crimes. That is, they should refuse to convict these defendants in part to redress the racism and discrimination experienced by Blacks, and in part because Butler argues that these defendants should be addressed in the African American community instead. In this article I summarize Butler's call to nullify and critically review Leipold's and Marder's critiques of Butler's proposal. I argue that Butler's call is a principled tool to use while also working to change disparate treatment and impact due to discrimination in the criminal justice system, while also exploring the problematic issue of returning offenders to the community.

Key Words: jury nullification • Paul Butler • Nancy Marder • criminal justice • discrimination

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 39, No. 4, 508-527 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0021934706297878


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?