This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0021934709335136v1 40/1/77    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reid-Merritt, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Defining Ourselves: Name Calling in Black Studies

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: patreidmer{at}aol.com.

	Abstract

What’s in a name? For the discipline that has become familiar to so many of us as Black Studies, much can be made of this question. While the study of Black people from multiple approaches and perspectives reflective of African worldviews and orientations is at the very core of the discipline, properly naming the field with a single, unifying designation has remained an elusive goal. In the past 40 years, the multidisciplinary nature of the field has contributed to the ongoing development of new programs and academic units with specialized foci and creative titles to match. This article examines the historical emergence and expansion of the field of Black Studies and the challenges that remain in appropriately naming the discipline and correctly identifying those who portend to be its practitioners.

First published on May 7, 2009, doi:10.1177/0021934709335136

Journal of Black Studies 2009;40:77.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?